Essence of the research
The phrase "goods of inadequate quality" is a legal assessment, while an expert establishes specific facts: the presence of defects, their nature, probable cause, impact on use, and compliance of the object with the contract.
Who conducts the research
The examination of substandard goods in Moscow is conducted by product examination expert Andrey Viktorovich. The work takes into account the object, documents, posed questions, technical documentation, condition of the goods, signs of use, damage, completeness, and the possibility of further use.
Objects and materials of the research
- furniture, clothing, shoes, and accessories
- Equipment and electronics with an engineer if necessary
- Interior items, household and children's goods
- Tools, packaging, and components
Characteristic defects and controversial signs
- production and operational defects
- Recurring defect after repair
- Non-compliance with description or completeness
- Damage during unpacking, delivery, or assembly
What the product examination expert determines
- Identification of the object and its compliance with the submitted documents
- Presence, location, and severity of defects, damages, and other commodity signs
- Probable stage and mechanism of formation of the identified deficiencies
- Impact of defects on completeness, appearance, and usability
- Sufficiency of product examination methods or the need for another specialist
Questions that can be posed to the expert
- Does the product have defects?
- What is the nature and mechanism of their formation?
- To which stage do the identified signs pertain?
- Do the defects prevent further use?
How the research is conducted
- Preservation of the object, its labeling, and connection with documents are checked
- Signs referring to objects are recorded: furniture, clothing, footwear and accessories, equipment and electronics with an engineer if necessary
- Photographic documentation is performed, and if necessary — available measurements and comparison of similar elements
- The actual condition is compared with the contract, instructions, acts, and the chronology of events
- Conclusions are formulated separately for each issue, indicating any limitations
Documents and source information
- receipt, contract, order, and warranty
- product, completeness, and packaging
- manual and operation information
- service, repair, and quality inspection reports
Scope of competence
The expert does not decide whether the seller is obliged to refund the money and does not replace the court. He describes technical characteristics, while the legal qualification and the claim are determined separately.
Cost and timeframe
The cost is determined after examining the object, the number of issues, the volume of documents, the need for a site visit, laboratory work, or the involvement of other specialists. Before starting the study, the scope of work, timeframe, price, and format of the final document are agreed upon.
Frequently asked questions
Is it possible to start with photographs?
Yes. Competence, the composition of materials, and the need for inspection can be determined from photographs and documents. A categorical conclusion about the nature of a defect usually requires direct examination of the object.
What if the object has already been repaired or modified?
It is necessary to provide acts, work orders, and photographs before intervention. The report separately considers which features could have been lost or altered.
Will the report be suitable for a claim or court?
Yes. A specialist's report can be used for a claim, negotiations, preparation of a lawsuit, objections, or a motion for appointment of a judicial examination. If the examination is appointed by the court, the final document is issued as an expert’s report within the scope of the questions posed.
Discuss research
What to send for initial analysis
- receipt, contract, order, and warranty
- product, completeness, and packaging
- manual and operation information
- service, repair, and quality inspection reports